Suggest another feature?
If there are any other features you think would be useful, and are general (not specific to small groups), then please suggest them here.
Please specify parameters explicitly.
Request: Make field numerical (was text).
Done
Comments
Can we also include centipede's?
Yes: anything that has segments.
I gather the field entry is seen as a character string and cannot be evaluated as a number?
So we can't use, for instance, &field:body%20segments>48
I can probably change it to a number if you would prefer.
I was thinking that people might want to put in estimates (e.g 46-48), but I am happy to make it a simple number.
I would need to check though that the > or < or <= and >= work though
Thanks, Tony.
I think estimates might be troublesome, especially in terms of format: 46 - 48 or 46-48 or 46 to 48. And then, in the case of this example, if I search for 47, it would be missed.
A number, even if it is out by 1 or 2 will be more useful.
But, as you say, Boolean logic might be available for the search terms anyway.
Done: made a number. No conflicting data.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observation_fields/17734
Very many thanks.
It appears one cannot use > or < in a search of a numerical field. Also multiple values (e.g. 46,47) does not work.
Have flagged a request.
Thank you, Tony.
Very helpful!
Add a Comment